Re: C# properties vs. accessors RFC

From:	Crypto Compress	Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:07:20 +0000
Subject:	Re: C# properties vs. accessors RFC
References:	1 2	Groups:	php.internals
Request:	Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message

I'd just like to point out the fact that RFC v1.1 from a year ago was exactly as above but people wanted all of these other features. They were not a property, they had no "guarding", no unset, isset, etc. The original RFC that was exactly as c# had it, nobody liked it. It was changed to its current incarnation because it now mimics exactly what everyone is use to with __get(), etc.

i think you refer to RFC 0.3 (could not find C# in 1.1):
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax#properties_in_c

cryptocompress


   

Thread (19 messages)

• Steve ClayWed, 23 Jan 2013 19:23:53 +0000
  • Ralph SchindlerWed, 23 Jan 2013 20:00:22 +0000
    • [email protected]Wed, 23 Jan 2013 20:43:56 +0000RE: [PHP-DEV] C# properties vs. accessors RFC
  • Clint PriestWed, 23 Jan 2013 20:54:09 +0000
    • Crypto CompressWed, 23 Jan 2013 21:07:20 +0000
      • Clint PriestWed, 23 Jan 2013 21:13:25 +0000
        • Crypto CompressWed, 23 Jan 2013 22:25:31 +0000
    • Levi MorrisonWed, 23 Jan 2013 21:17:24 +0000
      • Anthony FerraraWed, 23 Jan 2013 21:33:36 +0000
      • Crypto CompressWed, 23 Jan 2013 21:51:59 +0000
        • Levi MorrisonThu, 24 Jan 2013 01:12:54 +0000
          • Crypto CompressThu, 24 Jan 2013 13:45:06 +0000
      • Clint PriestWed, 23 Jan 2013 22:35:36 +0000
        • Rasmus LerdorfWed, 23 Jan 2013 22:40:50 +0000
          • Clint PriestWed, 23 Jan 2013 22:42:34 +0000
            • Crypto CompressWed, 23 Jan 2013 23:04:36 +0000
              • Clint PriestWed, 23 Jan 2013 23:45:34 +0000
                • Crypto CompressThu, 24 Jan 2013 00:12:01 +0000
        • Arpad RayThu, 24 Jan 2013 02:36:00 +0000