Re: ZTS - why are you using it?

From: Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:21:09 +0000
Subject: Re: ZTS - why are you using it?
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Zeev Suraski <[email protected]> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Pierre Joye [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 3:37 PM
>> To: Rasmus Lerdorf
>> Cc: PHP internals
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ZTS - why are you using it?
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Those ISPs are probably stuck in old fastcgi-land and haven't figured
>> > out FPM's ondemand pooling. If you idle out the ondemand children
>> > somewhat quickly you can support a lot of vhosts without using much
>> > memory since each one doesn't need to have a running process. Only
>> > hosts actually being accessed will have running processes.
>>
>> Not talking about Linux here, but IIS have something similar, but really
> not even
>> close to how FPM performs or how it works (having basically the pros of
> TS and
>> NTS).
>
> On Windows with impersonation you're actually in a better situation than
> you are in Linux.  You could hold a small pool of processes and handle as
> many different users as you'd like.

Works fine with ZTS too btw, IIS takes care about managing the
respective application pools.

But yes, impersonation is a huge on Windows/IIS, get ride of
openbasedir and all that in one go (and again, not NTS specific).

Cheers,
--
Pierre

@pierrejoye


Thread (55 messages)

« previous php.internals (#65395) next »