Re: Allow (...)->foo() expressions not only for `new`

From: Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:43:38 +0000
Subject: Re: Allow (...)->foo() expressions not only for `new`
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message 


On 02/25/2013 04:33 PM, Sara Golemon wrote:

When it comes to changing syntax, there is no such thing as too small
of an RFC IMO.  Runtime changes can occasionally be hand-waved, but
syntax changes are serious business.



Seeing this quoted makes me realize I expressed myself poorly.  What I
meant to convey was:

When it comes to syntax changes, there's no such thing as too small of
a change to need an RFC.

Which I think most parsed out correctly, but I want to be clear on
that position.  Bugfix or not, a parser change is a parser change.



It is actually great to see support for the RFC process.

Any new RFC page created in the wiki will get a bigger template than
previously provided. It looks like: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/template.
(Also see https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=64256 about updating the
template).  Whether it actually helps improve the quality of RFCs
remains to be seen.

Chris

-- 
[email protected]  http://twitter.com/ghrd
Newly updated, free PHP & Oracle book:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/php/underground-php-oracle-manual-098250.html

Thread (32 messages)

« previous php.internals (#66228) next »