On Mar 7, 2013, at 1:00 PM, David Soria Parra <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2013-03-07, Rasmus Lerdorf <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 03/07/2013 09:01 AM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
>>
>>> So my proposal is to slow down for a minute and not call this RFC
>>> accepted or not until we can come to some consensus as to if it
>>> classifies as a language change or not... Better to clarify for the
>>> health of the project than to plow through and risk causing further
>>> strife...
>>
>> And how do you propose we do that? Vote on it? Will that vote need 2/3
>> as well? I think most of us accepted that language-level changes meant
>> syntax changes. Things that add new features to the language itself.
>
> I think the only thing requiring a 2/3 vote would be the decision on
> wheather to enable it by default or not. As long as it's in ext/
> and not enabled a 50% should be sufficient.
Shouldn't we be focusing on how this makes PHP better? And not nitpick
about a percentage point or two?
This makes PHP better. Please, PHP, add it to 5.5.
Regards,
Philip