Re: Fix for bug #63437
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013, Anatol Belski wrote:
> I've reworked the patch from
> http://nebm.ist.utl.pt/~glopes/misc/date_period_interval_ser.diff
>
> (mentioned by tony2001) for bug #63437, that seems to fix the issue.
> That patch was ported back to 5.3 and adapted to the current 5.4+.
> Both variants are posted to the ticket.
Serializing this as a base64 encoded variant of some binary data is not
a good thing. If you want to serialize, it needs to output the same
thigns that allow users to create the period or interval. I also don't
think this would work for Big Endian vs Little Endian either.
cheers,
Derick
Thread (15 messages)