On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 19:46 +0100, Robert Stoll wrote:
> I agree with Amaury.
> Although, it is rather smelly code to use try/catch as control flow
> instrument, in some situations it is clearer to do it this way.
> I think the new construct would be especially useful if one just wants to
> log errors (no further exception handling is necessary) as shown in previous
> examples.
Logging is a different thing from error handling. exceptions are a tool
to handle (exceptional critically?) error situations.
johannes