Re: Proposal for better UTF-8 handling
Hi!
> I agree with Nikita — I'm not against adding more Unicode/charset
> handling functions if they make sense (and I haven't looked at the
> code for this particular proposal yet), particularly if they'd be part
> of a default build, but enough water has hopefully passed under the
Did you mean "would *not* be part of the default build"? Because having
yet another way of handling utf-8 (also basing on yet another separate
library so with potential for incompatibilities and quirks) doesn't look
like a good idea. Having yet another PECL ext is not a big deal, but
having yet another way by default certainly would only create confusion.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227
Thread (11 messages)