All,
I've updated the RFC, renaming "Protocol Type Hinting" to "Structural Type
Hinting" (keeping the name of the file for historical reasons).
I've also expanded out the use-cases with a dedicated section and two
examples (middlewares and third-party specified "standard" interfaces)...
Thoughts?
Anthony
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Anthony Ferrara <[email protected]>wrote:
> Robert,
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Robert Stoll <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I had a quick look at GO and as far as I understand they do not use duck
>> typing but a structural type system.
>> http://golang.org/doc/faq#implements_interface
>>
>> Please change this in your RFC to avoid misunderstandings.
>
>
> Great idea. I'll update the RFC and code to call it "structural typing"
> instead of protocol. A much better term...
>
> Thanks!
>