Re: Interest in a "null" SAPI for embedding?

From: Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:49:14 +0000
Subject: Re: Interest in a "null" SAPI for embedding?
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 19:17 -0400, J David wrote:
> 
> To stick with your example, of CLI and mod_php -- a good choice as
> it's likely the most common combo -- when linking to a common
> libphp5.so, the recommended methodology would be to build in only the
> functionality required by both, then load the rest as extensions from
> php-cli.ini or php.ini, respectively.  This seems like the way it is
> generally done anyway?
> 
> Is doing it this other way a thing that people actually do? 

Ah, there's another thing to mind: Extensions can be marked as "cli
extensions", if statically compiled they become only part of the CLI
binary, not other SAPIs. Think readline & pcntl.

johannes




Thread (15 messages)

« previous php.internals (#68575) next »