Re: Re: Signature compatibility: Number of arguments
From: Levi Morrison Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:57:12 +0000 Subject: Re: Re: Signature compatibility: Number of arguments References: 1 2 Groups: php.internals Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
I think of the following definition: function foo($bar = NULL) To really be two definitions with method overloading: > function foo() function foo($bar) Allowing an inheritor/implementor to choose to not implement the second signature does not seem logical at all when you think of them this way. I'm against this this proposal.
Thread (7 messages)
- Re: Signature compatibility: Number of arguments
- Re: Re: Signature compatibility: Number of arguments
- Re: Signature compatibility: Number of arguments
« previous | php.internals (#68688) | next » |
---|