On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Pierre Joye <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Levi Morrison <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> In which case we have very different ideas about what good design
> >> is and would never come to any agreement on that.
> >
> >
> > This is already evident in ALL of your recent "discussions" on this ML.
> Go
> > and look: you are the most active participant in each topic and you are
> > bickering in each one. Could you please stop dominating every discussion?
>
> I'd to say it is more an attempt to understand the needs of one
> feature or another. This is why this ML exists, to discuss (which may
> move to arguing sometimes, so it goes). But I won't ever ask someone
> to stop participating to discussions, unless it goes off topic or the
> tone is not appropriate (had one recently where my tone was not the
> best, I stopped :).
>
I didn't ask him to stop participating: I asked him to stop dominating
every discussion. There is a significant difference.
> That being said, there is always a point in a RFC discussion where
> there is nothing left to discuss or argue about, we are so far with
> this one.
We've been at this point for a while; no new arguments have been raised
despite several people asking to bring it back in focus.