Re: [RFC] Named parameters

From: Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 17:47:26 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Named parameters
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
+1 to named params. Please please please. :)

=> is my vote for syntax. Makes sense. Doesn't make sense to introduce another way to
express something we've been used to for years with key => value, and is it that important
to save one character per assignment?

On Sep 6, 2013, at 9:39 AM, Nikita Popov <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi internals!
> 
> I created an RFC and preliminary implementation for named parameters:
> 
>    https://wiki.php.net/rfc/named_params
> 
> The RFC and implementation are not yet complete. I mainly want to have
> feedback on the idea in general and on the Open Questions (
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/named_params#open_questions)
> in particular.
> 
> Thanks,
> Nikita


Thread (46 messages)

« previous php.internals (#68917) next »