On 11 September 2013 23:21, Bob Weinand <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I tried to widen the naming possibilities by allowing to use keywords as identifiers (for
> function names, class names, label (goto) names, ...) where possible. It doesn't break any BC.
>
> Furthermore when BC needs to be broken in future for new keywords, it will have a smaller
> impact as most usages of the new keyword then still work.
I like the idea, but it looks like the patch defers many string
comparisons from the parser to strcmps. Do you have performance
comparisons of running e.g. a framework, which uses those keywords a
lot?
--
Regards,
Mike