Re: Re: Allowing is_* functions to accept multiple parameters
Am 18.09.2013 um 21:57 schrieb "Leigh" <[email protected]>:
> On 18 September 2013 18:50, Bob Weinand <[email protected]> wrote:
>> At least, from a technical point, evaluating LTR would require to change the engine
>> (would be some more complex change as it would require to switch between contexts
>> and being able to execute the ZEND_SEND_VAL opcodes one by one
>
> Feels like you're overthinking it?
>
> Plan was to allow any is_* function to be called as normal (SEND_VAR,
> SEND_VAR ... FCALL), then iterate over the supplied arguments inside
> the function and return false at the first failure, emulating the
> boolean short circuit.
Well, the arguments are executed at the moment where the ZEND_SEND_VAR op is encountered. But this
you already can do with the one liner in my last mail..
So LTR support is basically not worth it here (too many change/too much cost for this).
Bob Weinand
Thread (19 messages)