On Sep 26, 2013 10:35 AM, "Joe Watkins" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>
> Thanks ...
>
> I have made many changes to the RFC and patch since the beginning of this
discussion ...
>
> It might be useful if you could all now go back to the RFC for another
read, point out anything I've left unclear at this point.
I saw your changes :) I would add more use cases if possible, the more the
better.
My feeling is that some does not see yet a good use case. It is a known
pattern is sometimes not a good enough argument.
Cheers,