Re: Proposal: Introduction of InvalidStateException
As a reminder, we do not top-post :)
@Ferenc: Ok, so let's try to wrap all these suggestion in the SPL RFC you
> pointed out and vote.
>
In case you didn't notice, I started that RFC quite some time ago ^^
Everything still applies.
> @Levi: I'd suggest to minimize BC breaks if you're willing to get this
> merged.
> Dunno how to proceed here, but that should be the focus.
>
I think major BC breaks can still make it in, we'd just have to go a
different route. I was thinking something along the lines of another
extension and eventually deprecate the SPL. I do agree that smaller BC
breaks have a better chance of making it in, as well as making it in
sooner. I suppose I'll compromise to some degree and compile a list of
BC-safe changes and list them in the RFC.
Thread (14 messages)