Re: Re: [vote] pow-operator

From:	Kris Craig	Date:	Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:35:23 +0000
Subject:	Re: Re: [vote] pow-operator
References:	1 2	Groups:	php.internals
Request:	Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message

>
>
> That said, if there are other reasons for voting 'no' besides
> associativity, feel free to shoot me an email or discuss it on the list.
>

What did it for me was the lower precedence for the unary minus.  I don't
want to have another language that thinks a negative number squared is a
negative number.  I understand and respect your reasoning as outlined in
the RFC, but this is a deal-breaker for me.

--Kris


   

Thread (15 messages)

• Tjerk MeestersWed, 18 Dec 2013 08:31:46 +0000
  • Tjerk MeestersThu, 19 Dec 2013 00:03:29 +0000Re: [vote] pow-operator
    • Kris CraigThu, 19 Dec 2013 00:35:23 +0000Re: Re: [vote] pow-operator
      • Tjerk MeestersThu, 19 Dec 2013 02:04:11 +0000
        • Hannes MagnussonThu, 19 Dec 2013 02:08:31 +0000
          • Tjerk MeestersThu, 19 Dec 2013 03:17:08 +0000
            • Sherif RamadanThu, 19 Dec 2013 03:59:24 +0000
            • Pierre JoyeThu, 19 Dec 2013 06:52:17 +0000
              • Kris CraigThu, 19 Dec 2013 08:12:27 +0000
        • Levi MorrisonThu, 19 Dec 2013 02:38:19 +0000
          • Andrea FauldsThu, 19 Dec 2013 18:08:44 +0000
            • Sean CoatesThu, 19 Dec 2013 18:18:57 +0000
              • Andrea FauldsThu, 19 Dec 2013 18:41:03 +0000
              • Tjerk MeestersThu, 19 Dec 2013 19:09:53 +0000
                • Christopher JonesThu, 19 Dec 2013 19:14:18 +0000