Re: Re: power operator (again)
From: Mike Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 23:14:03 +0000 Subject: Re: Re: power operator (again) References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Groups: php.internals Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 17:24 -0500, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > Tjerk, I hadn't noticed this part of your patch before. > > https://github.com/datibbaw/php-src/commit/f60b98cf7a8371233d800a6faa286ddba4432d02 > > I don't think this is necessary and it looks odd having pow as a > language construct. There is nothing wrong with having pow() as a > regular legacy function here. > > Without this piece I think adding ** is a good idea. I already voted, but I have to second that. -- Regards, Mike
Thread (29 messages)
« previous | php.internals (#70794) | next » |
---|