Re: [RFC] __debug_info()
From: Santiago Lizardo Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 21:51:39 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC] __debug_info() References: 1 2 Groups: php.internals Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
Sara has used stream_get_meta_data in his RFC example and I think is a good name for the new method, IMHO. __metadata (or __get_metadata if you prefer an action/verb for methods) Removing the debug keyword from the equation broadens the possibilities on how people might use it. On 01/21/2014 09:42 PM, Frédéric Hardy wrote:Hi all ! Le 21 janv. 2014 à 22:26, Sara Golemon <[email protected]> a écrit :-- Santiago Lizardo Oscares http://www.santiagolizardo.comSomething new to argue about: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/debug-infoVery interesting feature (i have personally thinking about that several time in the past). However, i think that __dump() is a better name from the end user point of view. __debug_info() is a good name from the point of view of a C developer which works on the Zend Engine or on C extensions, but from the end user point of view, it’s not the case. And this new magical method is used internally by var_dump() so __dump() seems to me a better name. Maybe __set_dump() is an alternative too, because __set_state() is used internally by var_export(), but i’m not sure that it’s a better name than __dump which is very explicit and intuitive. Best regards, Fred.
Thread (30 messages)
| « previous | php.internals (#71387) | next » |
|---|