Hi Chris,
On Wed, January 22, 2014 20:36, Christopher Jones wrote:
The open issues (e.g. SAPI support) need to be resolved before
starting the vote, so the RFC direction is obvious. Also the RFC needs to
discuss proposed voting options, prior to starting the vote. Since that
only gives a couple of days for discussion, I think you should delay the
vote.
I'm not sure taking SAPI and ZPP topics out of the scope apart into new
RFCs would make any sense? But we probably can do multple votings in the
same RFC. That will be probably the most plausible solution to decide, I
gonna to update it :)
The porting doc compat/PECL_PORTING should be merged into the RFC (and
removed from the tree) to capture as much information in the one place as
possible.
I thought more like pick it out into a separate wiki page, as it's porting
specific. Still it will be linked from/to RFC, but the structure were
cleaner IMHO.
It can be a separate section of the RFC. This will make the project's
scope clear when it comes to voting on the RFC.
Chris