On 24/01/14 06:34, Adam Harvey wrote:
So here's my question: should we be starting to lay out a rough
schedule and list of desired features for a new major release? (I'm
going to call it 5++, since the actual number is controversial; I'd
prefer 7, but I know there's a school of thought that 6 is usable
again. Whatever. We can bikeshed that down the track.)
I realise some on internals would moan, but so far as users care, I think 6 would make the most sense.
And yes, I think we should lay out a schedule. We definitely need to have more time to prepare this than a usual x.y+1 release, though - a major release is a major overhaul and 12 months is probably not enough.
--
Andrea Faulds
http://ajf.me/