Re: [VOTE] RFC: Multibyte Char Handling
Yasuo wrote:
> In contrast, my RFC is intended to replace mbstring by mbstring-ng.
So is this what the current vote is on? If so the "Backward
Incompatible Changes: None." is wrong.
If the vote is only on adding the functions:
- mb_escape_shell_arg()
- mb_secape_shell_cmd()
- mb_fget_csv()
- mb_addslashes()
- mb_var_export()
- mb_stripslashes()
then all of the other suggestions about removing mbstring and
integrating mbstring-ng should not be in this RFC.
cheers
Dan
Thread (20 messages)