Re: Re: [PHP6] Function name consistency
From: Lester Caine Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:16:10 +0000 Subject: Re: Re: [PHP6] Function name consistency References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Groups: php.internals Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
Levi Morrison wrote:Well personally I'll continue to use the current functions. It was more a suggestion to free up the pressure on changing them at all. Let the people who object to the format have an alternative the rest of us can ignore ;) -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.ukIf we're going to do anything, be aggressive and far-reaching with it.Build a proper language-level OOP design for string/array manipulation. This is a completely honest, sincere question: Why should the language itself use an object-oriented design for everything it provides?
Thread (46 messages)
« previous | php.internals (#71729) | next » |
---|