Re: RE: RFC: expectations/assertions

From: Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 03:11:45 +0000
Subject: Re: RE: RFC: expectations/assertions
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
Hi all,

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki <[email protected]> wrote:

> php > assert('function() {return FALSE;}');
> php > assert('function() {return TRUE;}');
>
> It does not work, but
>
> php > assert(eval('function() {return FALSE;};'));
>
> Warning: assert(): Assertion failed in php shell code on line 1
>
> so closure in eval() works. I don't see reason not to allow closure
> directly.
> It only seems inconsistent to me.
>

Added this to inconsistent behaviors RFC to track.

https://wiki.php.net/rfc/inconsistent-behaviors#assert

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
[email protected]


Thread (44 messages)

« previous php.internals (#72237) next »