Re: Named params status
On 22 Feb 2014, at 16:15, Patrick Schaaf <[email protected]> wrote:
> I know that I said it more nicely before.... That is stupidity.
>
> Just release the feature for user code (self-written functions and methods).
>
> Create a suitable variation of the internals function declaration macros that
> expresses "this function has been vetted for named parameter usage, and refuse
> to accept named parameters (FATAL) for any function not so vetted.
>
> Then let the internal function vetting proceed at whatever pace it takes,
> later.
>
> If you first wait for each and every internal (and extension?) function being
> converted, this will never happen.
I know. I asked Nikita about this on IRC about a month or two ago. I think he said he just didn’t
want to deliver an incomplete feature?
--
Andrea Faulds
http://ajf.me/
Thread (13 messages)