Hi all,
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Andrey Andreev <[email protected]> wrote:
> It is not broken functionally, indeed.
> It's broken by design - if I write session_start(), options or not, I
> would never expect it to immediately close the session. It's highly
> misleading and this will lead to a lot of abuse.
>
I don't want to confuse users.
Better name would be appreciated.
Perhaps, "close" may be better option name.
session_start(['read_only'=>true]);
↓
session_start(['close']=>true);
Any comments/better names?
Regards,
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
[email protected]