Re: PHP Specification
From: Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 07:09:57 +0000 Subject: Re: PHP Specification References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Groups: php.internals Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
On 27/03/2014 18:21, David Soria Parra wrote:"Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa" <[email protected]> schrieb:-- Ivan Enderlin Developer of Hoa http://hoa-project.net/ PhD. student at DISC/Femto-ST (Vesontio) and INRIA (Cassis) http://disc.univ-fcomte.fr/ and http://www.inria.fr/ Member of HTML and WebApps Working Group of W3C http://w3.org/On 26/03/2014 18:58, David Soria Parra wrote:I am not sure about php-src as it refers to the source itself, but it's fine by me as long as we have a distinguished name. Yup, definitively. We will discusss about it later."Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa" <[email protected]> schrieb:What about php-src?On 24/03/2014 10:37, Johannes Schlüter wrote:We should just call it cphp or something to distinguish language (PHP) from the php.net reference implementation :)On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 10:15 +0100, Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa wrote:Historical is not synonym of out-dated. Historical means it is the first interpreter, that's all.How is that historic? It is the prime standard with most active contributors etc.* the historical interpreter [1],
Thread (53 messages)
| « previous | php.internals (#73459) | next » |
|---|