Re: Proposal for license change
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 05:27 +0700, [email protected] wrote:
> > Products derived from this software may not be called "PHP", nor may
> "PHP" appear in their name, without prior written permission from
> [email protected]. You may indicate that your software works in
> conjunction with PHP by saying "Foo for PHP" instead of calling it
> "PHP Foo" or "phpfoo"
> I propose removing this clause from the PHP license for GPL
> compatibility. My proposal is to make PHP a trademark (as Python is),
> because trademark law is intended to deal exactly with this issue. I'm
> completely happy with the current license, but I propose this as an
> improvement.
It is not that trivial. A few quick thoughts:
* Getting a trademark for three letters isn't trivial, most
trademark authorities limit those to few cases like BMW or SAP.
We could probably prove PHP's relevance but still effort
* Unlike Python we have no legal entity which could own it. We
could only register it to a natural person (i.e. Rasmus)
* We have no fundings to finance the registration (registration
fees, lawyer to do the bureaucracy etc)
* The thing with GPL compatibility is partly a religious thing --
Mind GPL's virality: If one component is GPL all other parts
become GPL, too. So if we'd lateron start bundling GPL code we
are on a sword's edge of becoming GPL. This becomes really
complicated with extensions for commercial libraries. Some
contributors also have stronger objections to GPL.
* We make use of other components which probably aren't
GPL-compatible licensed either, see i.e. php-src/main/spprintf.c
* Such a drastic change might require collecting permission from
all past contributors. Some of them are hard to reach.
johannes
Thread (5 messages)