Re: [RFC] Skipping parameters take 2

From: Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 02:01:20 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Skipping parameters take 2
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
Just a note:

I still think a single char token (like ~) would look great and
wouldn't be "cryptic" like Yasuo argued. But, as said before, it's
just a minor observation. The default token is a great option and
sounds very intuitive to anyone I've asked for opinions.

2015-01-17 22:52 GMT-03:00 Marcio Almada <[email protected]>:
>> Cryptic notation is not a PHP way. IMHO.I like original "default" proposal and it
>> is good enough.
>> Regards,
>
> When I suggested _ it was more as a feature wandering. I like
> default too. The RFC looks good enough as it is now :)
>
> 2015-01-17 22:14 GMT-03:00 Yasuo Ohgaki <[email protected]>:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Patrick Schaaf <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 14.01.2015 20:50 schrieb "Simon J Welsh" <[email protected]>:
>>> >
>>> > >    create_query("deleted=0", "name", _, _, true);
>>> > >
>>> > > Still not sure if it's better than default, though.
>>> >
>>> > That would be a BC break as you can currently have a constant _.
>>>
>>> A visually pleasing (IMO), even easier to type, and non-BC alternative,
>>> could be using a dash:
>>>
>>> create_query("deleted=0", "name", -, -, true);
>>
>>
>> Cryptic notation is not a PHP way. IMHO.
>> I like original "default" proposal and it is good enough.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --
>> Yasuo Ohgaki
>> [email protected]


Thread (69 messages)

« previous php.internals (#80716) next »