Re: [VOTE] RFC: Introduce session_start() options - read_only, unsafe_lock, lazy_write and lazy_destroy

From: Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:05:56 +0000
Subject: Re: [VOTE] RFC: Introduce session_start() options - read_only, unsafe_lock, lazy_write and lazy_destroy
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
Hi all,

On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki <[email protected]> wrote:

> Modified patch for this RFC is here
>
> https://github.com/yohgaki/php-src/compare/PHP-5.6-rfc-session-lock
>
> There may be leftover still. I'll check it again later, but it's
> appreciated if you find any.
>
> Someone asked if I'm going to allow to change all of session INIs by
> session_start(),
> I think it's good to have.
>
> I would like to implement this as hash of INI options and handlers like
>
>   "option_name" => function_of_INI_modify_handler;
>
> This way, I can iterate parameter array easily/efficiently, can change INI
> values
> easily/efficiently and raise appropriate errors.
>
> Any comments for this?
>

Sorry that the patch didn't included in PHP 5.6.
I've made patch for master since PHP 5.6 is released already.

https://wiki.php.net/rfc/session-lock-ini
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1016

Except comments, changes are almost minimal, but includes a few bug fixes
that tests equality of PS(session_status) against "php_session_none". The
comparison must be "PS(session_status) != php_session_active" as it has
php_session_disabled. I also removed 2 needless session globals.

Comments are appreciated.
This patch boosts PHP application performance a lot when session data
have not changed. It's faster than benchmark in the wiki because hashing
has removed.

If I don't any comment in a few days, I'll merge it to master.

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
[email protected]


Thread (13 messages)

« previous php.internals (#80951) next »