Re: [RFC][DISCUSSION] ReflectionParameter::getClassName()
On 31 January 2015 at 17:31, Philip Sturgeon <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Matteo Beccati <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> 2) There's a tiny bit of overlap with "scalar type hints",
>
> 2) There might be some overlap in the scalar type hint stuff kinda,
> but I'd like to think there isn't. getClassName() is just
> getClass()->name
I think Matteo's point is that if any scalar type RFC passes, a
type-hint for a parameter would not always be the name of a class, so
the method name 'getClassName()' would be misleading.
It would be good to choose a better name to avoid that problem.
cheers
Dan
Thread (10 messages)