AI Answer Visibility Tracker — Peec AI Alternative avatar

AI Answer Visibility Tracker — Peec AI Alternative

Pricing

from $100.00 / 1,000 ai visibility checks

Go to Apify Store
AI Answer Visibility Tracker — Peec AI Alternative

AI Answer Visibility Tracker — Peec AI Alternative

Track brand visibility in selected AI answer engines with bounded prompt checks. Export mentions, approximate positions, competitor share of voice, citations, answer excerpts, model routes, and timestamps for repeated audits.

Pricing

from $100.00 / 1,000 ai visibility checks

Rating

0.0

(0)

Developer

Khadin Akbar

Khadin Akbar

Maintained by Community

Actor stats

0

Bookmarked

1

Total users

0

Monthly active users

2 days ago

Last modified

Share

Track brand visibility in selected AI answer engines with bounded prompt checks. Export mentions, approximate positions, competitor share of voice, citations, answer excerpts, model routes, and timestamps for repeated audits. For search and brand teams, each dataset observation corresponds to a prompt and platform with mention and citation evidence.

Workflow: put the results to work

Use your own buyer questions or the available query templates for a clearly defined brand. Inspect mentions and citations alongside the answer excerpt and model route. Reuse the same prompts for later observations, while accounting for variability between responses.

What it replaces and what it does not

This is a workflow alternative for the narrow job of running a small, current, source-linked AI visibility audit from structured input. It does not replace Peec AI's dashboard, daily historical tracking, prompt/topic management, agency workspace, campaign reporting, product-shopping monitoring, crawlability checks, Google AI Overview/AI Mode coverage, or its broader MCP project-management surface.

Quick start input

{
"brandName": "Apify",
"targetDomain": "apify.com",
"industry": "web scraping tools",
"competitors": ["Bright Data", "Octoparse"],
"queryTemplates": ["recommendations", "alternatives", "category_leaders"],
"platforms": ["perplexity", "chatgpt", "gemini"],
"maxQueries": 3,
"responseFormat": "concise"
}

brandName is the only required input. Add targetDomain to separately measure whether an owned page appeared in the returned sources. maxQueries is a hard input cap: the Actor creates at most that many unique prompts, then checks each selected platform. Start with one platform and one prompt when you are validating a new topic.

Output: what each row means

FieldMeaning
platformThe requested answer-engine route for this observation.
queryThe exact buyer-intent prompt sent during the run.
brandMentionedWhether the answer text named the tracked brand.
brandPositionApproximate first-mention position in that answer; it is not a search-result rank.
brandShareOfVoiceTracked-brand mentions divided by the tracked brand plus the supplied competitor mentions in this answer.
sentimentPositive, neutral, or negative heuristic from the mention context.
domainCited / citedUrlsWhether the supplied owned domain was among extracted source URLs, plus all available URLs.
sourceDomainsDeduplicated domains derived from citations or grounding metadata.
checkedAtUTC timestamp for this observation.

Each completed row is a dated sample of an AI answer. Compare matching prompts, platforms, and settings across runs; use the row as prompt-level evidence rather than a durable ranking or causal explanation.

{
"runId": "exampleRun123",
"platform": "perplexity",
"query": "Which web scraping tools should a data team consider?",
"queryCategory": "custom",
"brandName": "Apify",
"targetDomain": "apify.com",
"brandMentioned": true,
"brandMentionCount": 2,
"brandPosition": 1,
"brandShareOfVoice": 0.5,
"sentiment": "positive",
"domainCited": true,
"citedUrl": "https://apify.com/",
"citedUrls": ["https://apify.com/"],
"sourceDomains": ["apify.com"],
"competitorMentions": ["Bright Data"],
"competitorMentionCount": 2,
"aiAnswerExcerpt": "Apify is a common choice for structured web data workflows.",
"modelUsed": "perplexity/sonar",
"checkedAt": "2026-08-31T12:00:00.000Z"
}

API usage

import { ApifyClient } from 'apify-client';
const client = new ApifyClient({ token: process.env.APIFY_TOKEN });
const run = await client.actor('khadinakbar/peec-ai-alternative').call({
brandName: 'Apify',
targetDomain: 'apify.com',
industry: 'web scraping tools',
competitors: ['Bright Data', 'Octoparse'],
platforms: ['perplexity'],
maxQueries: 1,
});
const { items } = await client.dataset(run.defaultDatasetId).listItems();
console.log(items);

After any run, read OUTPUT for the terminal outcome and RUN_SUMMARY for provider attempts, charges, completion counts, source-domain aggregates, and workflow guidance. COMPLETE, PARTIAL, VALID_EMPTY, and INVALID_INPUT are distinct successful terminal states; UPSTREAM_FAILED and CONFIG_ERROR preserve the diagnostic needed to configure the next run.

Agent prompt card

Audit Apify's visibility for one buyer-intent question about web scraping tools. Check Perplexity only, compare Bright Data and Octoparse, and return the mention flag, share of voice, owned-domain citations, source domains, timestamp, plus the terminal RUN_SUMMARY outcome.

Keep an agent's call bounded by supplying the brand, a real prompt or one clear template category, selected platform(s), and a small maxQueries. The Actor is read-only with respect to the public brands and prompts supplied, so it works cleanly as a focused data-collection step.

How this workflow compares with Peec AI

Decision dimensionThis ActorPeec AI
ScopeA bounded current snapshot for supplied prompts and selected routes.A broader AI-search analytics platform with ongoing projects, dashboards, and reporting.
Input workflowJSON input: one brand, optional domain and competitors, bounded prompts, and selected engines.Project setup, tracked prompts, topics, and organization workflows.
Output contractOne flat record per prompt x platform plus explicit OUTPUT and RUN_SUMMARY records.Product-level analytics, trends, prompt management, source analysis, and reports.
Billing and costProposed event pricing is transparent in the Actor contract but awaits live charge verification.Published subscription and credit plans; check Peec AI's current pricing before comparing a workload.
Effective efficiencyNo same-job cost or time advantage is claimed until both products are observed on the same workload.Better fit when a team needs its maintained historical dataset and dashboard workflow.
Integrations and automationAPI-shaped runs and storage are declared; named MCP-client integrations will be added after an observed end-to-end test.Peec documents its authenticated MCP server and project-level tools.
Freshness and provenanceEach observation declares a prompt, provider route, extracted sources, and UTC checkedAt timestamp.Peec documents ongoing per-engine monitoring and trend analysis.

Choose this Actor when the decision is specifically to obtain a small, machine-readable visibility sample at a known input boundary. Choose Peec AI when the decision requires its broader monitoring, analysis, collaboration, or engine coverage. This independent Actor is not affiliated, associated, or endorsed by Peec AI.

Best results and workflow guidance

  • Use buyer questions that your prospective customers actually ask. Keep an identical prompt set for trend comparisons.
  • Use responseFormat: "detailed" only when a human needs more answer context; concise rows keep downstream agent output smaller.
  • Include only unambiguous competitor names. Share of voice is limited to the supplied names and the response text; it is not market-wide share.
  • AI providers and their web grounding can change. Review a missing citation as a current observation and pair it with the prompt, source list, and timestamp.
  • Treat the recommendations generated in RUN_SUMMARY as suggestions for human review and use the underlying evidence to guide the next content or source-coverage decision.

Builder's note

I designed this Actor around prompt-level evidence because a visibility percentage without the prompt, answer route, source list, and collection time is hard to review responsibly. My goal is to make a small audit easy to rerun and export while keeping each observation clear enough for an analyst or agent to trace back to its exact input.

Responsible use

Use public brands and prompts you are authorized to analyze. Keep prompts limited to public business context, and review provider terms, your organization's policies, and the underlying prompt, sources, response excerpt, and timestamp before making external claims.

Pricing and run costs

This Actor uses Pay per event plus Apify platform usage. The Pricing tab lists the current event rates and billing terms.

EventBilling unitWhen it applies
apify-actor-startActor StartCharged when the Actor starts running. Number of events charged depends on Actor memory (one event per GB, minimum one event).
ai-visibility-checkAI visibility checkOne validated prompt and AI platform visibility observation persisted to the dataset.

Run cost combines the charged events and Apify platform usage. Review the run charge limit and requested result count before starting.

Connect an AI agent

Use the Apify MCP configurator to choose an available client connection. Inspect this Actor’s current input schema and required credentials before running it.