Skip to main content
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2112.15319 (cs)
[Submitted on 31 Dec 2021 (v1), last revised 3 Mar 2023 (this version, v3)]

Title:A Critical Review of Inductive Logic Programming Techniques for Explainable AI

Authors:Zheng Zhang, Liangliang Xu, Levent Yilmaz, Bo Liu
View a PDF of the paper titled A Critical Review of Inductive Logic Programming Techniques for Explainable AI, by Zheng Zhang and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Despite recent advances in modern machine learning algorithms, the opaqueness of their underlying mechanisms continues to be an obstacle in adoption. To instill confidence and trust in artificial intelligence systems, Explainable Artificial Intelligence has emerged as a response to improving modern machine learning algorithms' explainability. Inductive Logic Programming (ILP), a subfield of symbolic artificial intelligence, plays a promising role in generating interpretable explanations because of its intuitive logic-driven framework. ILP effectively leverages abductive reasoning to generate explainable first-order clausal theories from examples and background knowledge. However, several challenges in developing methods inspired by ILP need to be addressed for their successful application in practice. For example, existing ILP systems often have a vast solution space, and the induced solutions are very sensitive to noises and disturbances. This survey paper summarizes the recent advances in ILP and a discussion of statistical relational learning and neural-symbolic algorithms, which offer synergistic views to ILP. Following a critical review of the recent advances, we delineate observed challenges and highlight potential avenues of further ILP-motivated research toward developing self-explanatory artificial intelligence systems.
Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1907.10952 by other authors
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2112.15319 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2112.15319v3 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.15319
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Bo Liu [view email]
[v1] Fri, 31 Dec 2021 06:34:32 UTC (3,749 KB)
[v2] Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:14:00 UTC (1 KB) (withdrawn)
[v3] Fri, 3 Mar 2023 07:11:25 UTC (8,471 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A Critical Review of Inductive Logic Programming Techniques for Explainable AI, by Zheng Zhang and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2021-12
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Zheng Zhang
Bo Liu
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences