That wasn’t a moral judgment of the Russian invasion, it was just pointing out a strategic reality for neighbors. Likewise, Gazans would probably have issue with buying Israeli products if given choice.

Still, I don’t know what to tell you. Russian carbon energy export profits have fallen hard since the beginning of the invasion, with much of the losses coming out of their pipelines.

See this graph in this article/report. You can find quite a lot of other articles talking about how the recent spike in prices from the Hormuz bullshit is a huge boon for Russian carbon energy.

They’ve been selling oil and gas this entire time, there isn’t any need to secure customers, they already have them. The discount is essentially the effect that they have a smaller pool of buyers, and those buyers piss off a number of other players (countries, buyers, sellers, insurance, etc) by buying from Russia. A few buyers have to also contend with paying a country that has demonstrated a willingness to invade their neighbors. Many of the former Soviet states, for example, have continued to buy Russian oil this entire time, while putting in big efforts to transition away. Their oil and gas purchases have been heavily criticized by people who don’t understand how long it takes to change energy sources.

Yes, that’s what the sanctions are intended to do. Russia should struggle to make any profit from their gas and oil. It would be ideal if they couldn’t sell at all, but forcing them to sell at steep discounts is still very good. This Hormuz straight business has unfortunately caused the price of oil to go up, which will significantly increase the price Russia can sell at.

What’s the difference if your food has an expiration date?

What’s I2P?

I think you’re right, but now we’ve got the issue that such a spectrum makes zero sense for a pure compound. Why can’t my memes be scientifically perfect???

What in the heck is that graph? Abundance as a function of time?? What? But the data looks a lot more like some kind of EMR spectrum?

Couldn’t you make it a bunker buster?

It’s not even less hair follicles, it’s hair that’s shorter, thinner, and now blonde. You have hair on your nose, you just don’t notice it because of how short and thin the hairs are. So it goes with “hairless” chests.

Ah, yes, this would be a frustrating map to try and actually use.

They still do. Military exercises are not about determining which side is better. It’s about learning things, practicing things, simulating things, etc. Often times one side will fail and then the exercise will continue on as if they succeeded, because, again, the point is not to score wins and loses. It’s fact-finding. It’s training.

It’s kind of like of the F35 loses in dogfights to older planes whenever they test that scenario. If the F35 is in a dogfight in real life, a completely unrealistic number of things have lined up and gone wrong for that pilot. In real life the F35 would just shoot the older planes out of the sky from the other side of the horizon.

It’s a much closer approximation, anyway.

High security stuff where anything electronic is a spy device until thoroughly proven otherwise. You’re not going to get a specific answer unless OP is an idiot.

Denovo Techniques in Waste Generation and Cost Overruns: A Look Into the Walrus-Dragon Lab Methodology

Printed letter paper has about 80 lines per page. Rough numbers let’s call it 100. That makes for 1,450 pages. Let’s double it by assuming lots of page headers, comments, half-filled pages, etc. So 3000 sheets of paper. A ream of paper is 500 sheets, so we’re looking at 6 reams. A ream is about 4 cm thick, but let’s call it 5 since there will be air and creases and whatever. So 30 cm gets us to about a foot high for our code, all printed out.

I’m pretty sure my original question was correct, this isn’t the code. I’m pretty sure it’s the debug output.

It’s my understanding that that is the the debug output from the program, is it not?

It wouldn’t. They just added that in there for the scaries and they probably didn’t think it through much.

It’s my understanding that the specific direction on this relative motion graphic is just made-up, but it does do a good job of reminding people that we’re orbiting the galactic center.

I never like calling mosquitoes the deadliest animal. They’re a disease vector, not the actual death-cause.

It really depends on which trade-offs you consider worth it. Reducing economic friction has huge benefits, even if you have to give up some national financial tools to get it.