Today’s development is that I’m committing theft from content creators on YouTube.

OK. So, you think I, as an unemployed writer, am responsible for “content creators”? What the fuck does that mean, anyway? I’ve shot porn, written lots of columns and editorials, and taken photos.

This is back when we didn’t call it “content.” So what’s your point? Up-and-comers need more money than corporate America and me?

I’m going to need a more compelling argument than “you’re stealing if you use an adblocker.” I simply don’t have the energy to point out that if losing work as an editor makes me a thief, you should direct your ire to the media companies that no longer care to hire us.

If I were making six figures and owned my home, as I should at 46, sure … fair play. I can afford YouTube Premium. Neither is true, so this feels mostly like a case of “shut up, nationally award-winning pleb who has literally run newspapers; you don’t understand the media industry.”

And in a manner of speaking, they’re right. I understood it only while we had the audacity to commit journalism.

  • Megaman_EXE ( Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    29 days ago

    I would rather people just enjoy what I make and spread the word. The extra exposure and support get you further as a “content creator” than the small amounts of ad revenue.

    Unless you’ve got a huge audience, but even at that point, the highest paid creators on youtube are still making bank even with ad blockers, so… I don’t really understand the argument. If you’re a small creator, you’re not really making enough to support yourself, and it seems like the smart move is to not rely on ad revenue at all.