Yes, users only see communities from other instances on all that another user from their own instance has subscribed too (or I suppose that they subscribed to but usually people aren’t suprised about that)

Tbh I think an instance not enforcing tagging content as nsfw is probably very strong grounds for blocking imo

Yep I notice their sync rate has been really slow

Critical section uses a shared variable so any case you have multiple threads writing to a variable you should have a critical section, it’s very general. I don’t have much experience with reduction but it seems geared towards all loops preforming the same function as part of a larger function and they take approximately the same amount of time to complete plus are expected to start and end together. Something like parallelizing an integral by spliting it into ranges would be simpler with reduction. Also if the threads need to read and write to the global, seems like that would need a critical section.

I’ve been making communities here instead of writing the paper I should be working on

It’s not like you could have polled users that hadn’t joined yet anyways. Maybe the blocked list could be made more visible so people could be informed early on before they get too invested in their account?

Sorry wrong person

From what I’ve seen people saying it’s because the users have a reputation for getting overly involved in other instances (skewing voting in news communities) which seems like a recipe for conflict. That kind of thing can have a big impact on a new/small instance, maybe if this was bigger with more mods then it wouldn’t be such a problem. I think some separation of politically extreme communities might be required in general because they mix like oil and fire then spill everywhere.

More discussion: https://www.reddit.com/r/Lemmy/comments/142h1a5/choosing_an_instance_and_my_issues_with_lemmygrad/

With the effective implementation of AI, it could potentially boost the nation’s GDP by 50% or more in a short time.

That’s a bold claim, I’d like to see a source on that

Original answer:

It’s hard to give you an answer to your first question with just those graphs because it looks like one run on one dataset split. To address this part specifically:

My current interpretation is that the validation loss is slowly increasing, so does that mean that it’s useless to train further? Or should I rather let it train further because the validation accuracy seems to sometimes jump up a little bit?

The overall trend is what’s important, not small variations, try to imagine the validation loss curve smoothed out and you don’t want to go beyond the minimum of that curve. Technically overfitting is indicated by a significant difference in loss between training and testing.

It would be only Quebec/NL/LB. Very small amount of salmon compared to the rest of the market, not something you would find in walmart. Conservation groups have been calling for tighter restrictions for years and it might be they’re only giving out licenses to indigenous or recreational/sport atm. In Canada, we have special rules for indigenous that they can basically ignore certain/limits rules on hunting and fishing.

Original answer:

Short answer: Use a convolutional autoencoder (add convolution layers to the exterior of the autoencoder)

Long answer: From my experience with time series and autoencoders, it is best to do as much feature extraction as possible outside the autoencoder as it’s more difficult to train them to to do the feature extraction and dimensionality reduction. Consider using FFT or wavelet transforms on your data first. Even if they don’t extract your pattern exactly, it helps many applications. After transforming the data, train the convolutional autoencoder using the features and then to evaluate your model, reverse the transformation and compare with the original.

Both? The salmon along shipping routes or around them seems to be most at risk but it is also the most accessible https://www.asf.ca/about-atlantic-salmon/state-of-populations The northern salmon populations are healthiest but they are also furthest from population centers. In general, there is still too much atlantic salmon fishing. Canada is still assessing long term strategies for salmon population protection. Edit: we do have quotas/limits on salmon fishing already

Totally agree, I’m just suprised bc usually what I see from them is so dry

Different sure but they both have environmental impacts, wild salmon is extinct in some places already

Wild fishing for salmon has the same problems as wild fishing in general like bycatch

https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/reddit-blackout-1.6873756 It was the 3rd most popular article on cbc yesterday, there have also been some other news sites that picked up the story

Try changing your sorting from active to hot, some communities are really active right now compared to others.

People certainly code as a hobby or have personal projects. But I wouldn’t say reading a textbook is fun for me, if I want to make a personal app then I’ll just learn what I need as I go.

True, it’s feasible to be an active mod when the communities are small but you’d pretty quickly need to bring in other mods if they start growing too big. It’s certainly nice to have smaller communities around for some topics but for some to function well, they do kind of need a certain amount of active users. I know there’s some concern about too few servers that have all the large communities as well.

I think as more people are intrested in the project, more features will get added eventually.

? I though cloudflare disabled domain fronting?