• 0 Posts
  • 103 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: September 8th, 2025

help-circle
  • Great article, and the author brings receipts.

    I want to preface this by saying I’m not an AI doomer. I fundamentally disagree with the premise that a word prediction machine (LLM) is capable of intelligence. We’re no closer to AGI with LLMs than we ever were.

    I also think AI has its uses; it’s a great tool, for narrow, constrained use cases. Editing text and vibe coding simple scripts, for example—but even in incredibly simple cases, it gets shit wildly wrong very frequently.

    But the benefits are massively outweighed by the harms. Coaching suicide. Filling the web with AI slop. Reputational harm from not catching hallucinations. Semantic ablation.

    We’re not getting rid of AI; the models are here to stay, and anyone with $2K of hardware can run a decent model at home. But that’s also going to be the end of the AI bubble. There are no natural moats to protect a monopoly. OpenAI will never be profitable since the value they create is less than their operational costs. It’s a money pit.

    So, in a sense, I guess I am an AI doomer —the inevitable collapse of the AI bubble is going to cause a major recession, at least as big as the '08 financial crash, and these tech bros are doing massive harm both now and when the economic fallout lands. No surprise people want them dead.

    But I’m not worried about LLMs turning into SkyNet.




  • I think that the core idea, that Ubuntu is taking risks, shipping an LTS with major changes, is concerning. New core utils that don’t have feature parity, pipewire as a snap, a single-digit-days-old kernel (which has major changes to scheduling that cause known major regressions with some major software until they get updated), a new sudo implementation that may not be as secure (?), etc. Plus, jumping the hardware req to 6 GB and removing a GUI app for non-snap apps…

    Just more evidence that Ubuntu isn’t a good recommendation anymore.

    I’d go a step further, and say it’s a bad idea to recommend any Ubuntu-based distros. Yes, that means Mint.



  • Totally agreed, but authors are straight fucked if they try. Popular authors in my genre of choice have tried, and they all say it was a financial disaster for them, and that they can’t afford to be a full time author without KU income. And readers will follow where authors are, since those are the books they want to read.

    Amazon’s monopoly on self publishing is probably illegal, but until regulators notice, network effects and anticompetitive practices from Amazon reinforce their monopoly.

    Like, my options are, literally:

    • Stop reading almost all of the best books in the genre of books that I enjoy, or
    • Pirate the books, or
    • Read on Kindle Unlimited

    Authors have also said that they’re so dependent on The Algorithm, that pirating their books hits them double, from the lost revenue and from the reduced visibility. So that’s a double dick move.

    I hate it, but here we are.

    At least I read so much that Amazon pays authors like 10× what I pay to subscribe, so that’s pretty cool. (~300-400 books/year adds up to a lot of KENP pages!) And I’m not paying $3-5K/year for books to buy them all, sorry. I can’t afford that!


  • And another reason to support Canada joining the EU.

    Economies of scale can make a huge difference in costs, and requiring all cloud services to be entirely domestic would greatly limit options and increase costs. If we can join the EU, then we’ll be part of a big enough economic block to get full benefits from economies of scale and still retain data sovereignty within the context of membership.

    Fuck US corporations, their lobbyists, the regulatory capture that leads to their anti-consumer laws, and trade agreements exporting their wealth-concentration laws globally. Disney, in particular, can get fucked with their life-of-creator-plus-90-years copyright terms. But I digress.


  • The challenge is the monopolistic death grip Amazon has on self publishing.

    For many genres, authors get almost all of their income from Kindle Unlimited. KU requires exclusivity. The result is entire genres of books that are almost entirely Kindle exclusive.

    So, the only real options for readers of these genes is either Kindle Unlimited (or buying on Kindle, I suppose) or piracy.

    Some authors release serialized content on Patreon or a similar paid or free platform, but those platforms often only get first drafts, are difficult to navigate to get full books, and only cover a subset of authors anyway. And books get “stubbed”, which means everything past the 10% mark gets deleted to comply with Amazon exclusivity, so this is only even an option if you read the whole thing as it is being written. (FWIW, it’s also crazy expensive if you want to support authors; it can easily cost hundreds of dollars monthly with all the subscriptions.)

    So, if you want authors to get paid for their work, then, realistically, you’re stuck using Kindle.

    It sucks, but that’s the reality until regulators prevent Amazon from forcing exclusivity for inclusion in the KU program.



  • One wonders whether these old devices just don’t have enough telemetry built in for Amazon’s liking.

    I think it’s likely more about DRM.

    Old Kindles are incompatible with Amazon’s .kfx format ebooks and newer, stronger DRM. With an old Kindle, it was trivially easy to rip Kindle books to retail-quality epubs.

    With these devices ceasing to work with Kindle books starting next month, that loophole closes.

    Also, old Kindles will continue to work with already-downloaded Kindle books and DRM-free books, but new files can only be added by USB cable, not using Amazon’s services.

    The newer DRM also has working exploits, but it’s not nearly as easy, and they’ve indirectly hinted that one of the remaining methods may be closing soon. But, fundamentally, static media DRM (books, music, movies) is inherently beatable; the full content gets displayed to the user, so it can be intercepted and ripped. Worst case, someone will make a screen-capture app that uses perfect OCR to recreate the book. That’s already a solved problem, basically, it’s just horribly inefficient.

    So Amazon will continue to play whack-a-mole, turning millions of devices into e-waste, without even causing a blip for book pirates and those needing format shifting for accessibility.









  • The article highlights how the UK is moving to ban infinite scrolling access autoplay videos. So, thankfully, those changes are coming in at least some jurisdictions.

    That said, the article also helpfully points out that the Republican administration has stuffed their science & tech advisory panel with Meta and Google execs, so I’m doubtful that the US will regulate anything reasonable.

    I’d like a ban in effect for children below 16, but enforcement should be a misdemeanor on the parent. It should be a social worker coming to discuss with the parents the known harms of the platforms and let them get away with a warning, but that there will be fines if this damaging behaviour continues with an automatic 1-year (or whatever) follow-up. Basically, treat it the way it’s treated if parents are giving cigarettes to their children.


  • It’s a win, regardless, but the response is important.

    The response should be:

    • Make dark patterns illegal (highlighting options that prefer the platform over the user, making it harder to cancel, "opt inx not “opt out” to all non-core features, etc.)
    • Require a clear “click through” step in account creation that underage use has been proven to be harmful, leading to anxiety and death (and then let parents make their own, informed, choices)
    • Clear legal limits on data storage and retention to only include data necessary for the platform functions (i.e. mouse tracking and other invasive analytics are illegal)
    • User options to delete all data, or all data older than a given rolling date window (i.e. only retain 1-year of data, up to and including deleting old posts/content)
    • Clear legal limits on data analytics
    • Open audits of algorithmic feeds to ensure they are reasonable and not encouraging “engagement” with harmful/controversial content at elevated levels
    • No sharing of any user details with any external “partners” (advertisers), beyond very broad categories (age, location data at the 1M+ population region, gender)
    • Data portability
    • Require platform interoperability (i.e. alternative front ends through API or website loading through an intermediary client app)

    Like, there’s nothing wrong with social media as a concept, it’s that profit seeking + network effects + regulatory capture have incentivized harmful social media.