. This necessarily includes the results of that coin flip and the Geiger counter readings.

The OP said he flips the coin after going into the room. But the computer setup the boxes before they entered. So the computer knowing how you’d react to the coin flip can’t change the boxes.

There’s the possibility that there’s something else at play that we don’t know, and maybe cannot fathom.

The possibility that there is something hidden that we are not aware of is why Bell’s Theorem was such a revolution in physics. The experimental proof of Bell’s theorem won the nobel prize. There are no hidden variables. Probability is fundamental, not a result of some unknown process.

The premise wasn’t that the computer was 100% perfect. It was 99.9% perfect. That is its good enough such that you should assume its correct. The premise could have said 75% and it wouldn’t change anything. Saying 99% makes it simpler for the reader to assume that the computer is correct.

The computer is not supernatural. The premise does not say the computer is 100% accurate. The premise does not say that the computer can violate known laws of physics. The premise is that the computer knows your behavior.

Pedantic:

The three stars of orion are actually 9 stars. 1 is a trinary, one is a single star and one is a 5 star system.

Any updates? I’m having the problem again and now my heads aren’t parking/picked up about 1 in every 100 times (layers).

I just tried re-adjusting the belt tension. Again. It seems to be an issue with the U1.

HTML with CSS is Turing complete.

https://github.com/wizardpisces/js-ziju

As someone who started watching Saturday morning cartoons in the 1960’s, I can definitely say the mid 90’s was peak cartoon.

He didn’t say it was the best, only that it was better than Chrome.

He’s getting fresh blood from Thiel’s blood boys.

Then the experiments may be flawed. We dont know what we dont know

That’s the same excuse flat Earthers make. Yes every single observation made over the past 100 years could have been wrong and tomorrow we find out that all of quantum mechanics is wrong.

There are a near infinite number of variables involved, but if we knew every variable, we could solve it.

Take a single electron. You can’t define it’s position and motion (momentum) simultaneously. It is fundamentally unsolvable. There aren’t even hidden variables that we are unaware of. Bell’s inequality has been experimentally proven many times. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell’s_theorem

I believe the universe is determinate

That has been experimentally proven false and outside of all mainstream science.

While you can have a supernatural belief in a clockwork universe, the premise is a supercomputer makes the prediction, not God.

You didn’t read the article. The computer isn’t watching you flip the coin and then switching the boxes at the last moment.

The boxes are fixed before you enter the room. The computer has already predicted your choice.

Which is beside the point that the OP posited using a random process to make the choice for you. The method of randomness isn’t the issue. That’s why I said a Geiger counter could be substituted for a coin flip.

Don’t be pedantic. We all understand the meaning.

1st, a coin flip is random enough such that no computer can pre determine the result of the flip with 99.9% accuracy. The process is chaotic.

2nd, walk into the room with a Geiger counter and pick the box based on the click you get from a cosmic ray.

Is that a GPS tracker? What brand?

I went through the exact problem 2 days ago on my U1.

I was trying to print a very thick cylinder, with pctg directly on the bed (no pla support). Extremely simple and it kept failing. Glue stick and upping the bed temp didn’t seem to help. I also slowed acceleration. Oddly fewer wall loops helped so it made me think it was warping. I tried z hop and finally got it printing but it could have been a combo of doing the previous steps too.

It could also be a bed leveling problem. The mesh is only for head 1 and I was printing with head 4. Bed mesh is possible because I first tried printing 4 at once and 1 was good, 2 had a severe layer line but finished, and one failed. I then couldn’t re print that last one and kept having the failures where I tried everything above.

That’s one case study. He lists many more where throwing an epsilon at a floating point problem is the wrong solution.

What did you do that all your clients went to AI?

Your mom is lying to herself.

I used to add eggs to my children’s oatmeal. I cooked the oatmeal with milk and maple syrup so the result was like an oatmeal custard.

Why tho?