Infiltrated_ad8271

It remains to be seen, but you will probably make the switch without knowing or being able to tell the difference.

Eventually who knows, maybe “your” money will expire, can only be used on certain products, or whatever the real owners want.

TRY ARCH

PS: Just a meme to joke, if you want to analyze, please don’t point at me.

The study may help settle a long-standing debate about the existence of reliable sex differences in the brain.

How many studies on these lines must appear before this “debate” is overcome? It is even a truism! That we are a tabula rasa without sexual dimorphism is as absurd as biological determinism.

If the user base is signal’s big draw, I’m afraid we’re screwed with such a tiny one against those titans.

Signal users are far more likely to need to use whatsapp than the other way around, and migrating to signal is a huge loss with not very popular gains. I don’t see how it could compete on a level playing field, but that’s where the opportunity to eliminate signal’s huge disadvantage comes in.

You could go on without doing it. I would like to use signal to signal, but there are literally zero people interested in my environment :-(
Using signal just me would be much better than using whatsapp directly, and would reduce the data collected.

If signal suddenly stopped being mostly a geek desert and people could still talk to all their contacts, don’t you think they would be much more willing to move? The more people, the more people interested in migrating, and the less data for meta.

This is what I hate most about the privacy community, too fanatical and purist to allow extremely useful optional features that would allow them to reach more people.

Where did you see that? Are you sure you are not confusing it with fedora gnome?

If they were to recommend it, I’m sure there would be people who would end up breading it with salt.

Your attitude and constant insults are much worse.

fighting social injustices

There you have given yourself away as a troll.

Do ISPs “offer” them on a non-optional basis?

deleted by creator

Edit: I’m going to rephrase this so as not to divert it on the misinterpretation of a particular case.

Librewolf doesn’t check anything, it just applies patches automatically. That’s why sometimes bugs happen, like corrupting the user profiles of all flatpak users a year ago; entirely the fault of librewolf for not updating a line of code, and not of any third party.

Unfortunately doing so anonymously is not an option for many countries.

I tested it with a 16GB model and barely got 1 token per second. I don’t want to imagine what it would take if I used 16GB of swap instead, let alone 130GB.

It can probably be done with any video player, but it may be necessary to duplicate it and change the file extension.

NOPE. Every time I do it, I have to give them a lot of help and I end up becoming their technical support staff; my quota is already full, I’ve done my part.

https://idm.net.au/blog/002646two-years-european-isp%E2%80%99s-data

Ideally yes, but using btrfs with something like timeshift is enough.

You can see that the use cases above (commentary, criticism, news reporting and scholarly reports) does not qualify LLM companies to use or train their models

Seems quite obvious that the text you quoted refers exclusively to plagiarism. This does not include things like being inspired by it, referencing it, parodying it and of course not training AI either, because what matters is whether the result is protected content.

You can argue that memorizing and sharing training data is a copyright violation, and that’s a fair point, but it’s also worth noting that this is very much a minority, accidental and is being addressed.