The instance has experienced a lot of trolls signing up recently, so we need to moderate new accounts more strictly. The automated removal is needed to respond quickly to potential harassment. The comment was restored after manual review.
- 7 Posts
- 92 Comments
UlrikHD@programming.devto
Linux@programming.dev•Wayland didn’t kill Linux desktops, but it did expose their weakest assumptions [EDIT: Warning, article likely written with AI assistance]
5·3 months agoPlease have a second read of our Code of Conduct which you agreed to follow when signing up to our instance. Being purposefully hostile is not in line with that agreement.
Please follow our instance’s Code of Conduct and avoid using slurs, repeated breaches will lead to a temporary ban from our instance.
UlrikHD@programming.devMto
Programming@programming.dev•The (successful) end of the kernel Rust experiment
4·4 months agoHi
Can you update the title to be the same as the updated title in the news article?
The (successful) end of the kernel Rust experiment
Hi, I’ve sent you a new DM
Hey
Please check your DMs, you got unresolved reports from c/linux
UlrikHD@programming.devto
Tech@programming.dev•AlmaLinux gives Btrfs a home after Red Hat kicked it out
2·6 months agoPlease respect our instance’s Code of Conduct when interacting with our communities. Repeated breaches on admin moderated communities will lead to temporary instance-wide ban.
UlrikHD@programming.devto
Programming.dev Meta@programming.dev•How come this instance is often intermittently unreachable?
7·6 months agoFor the last ~2 weeks the infrastructure team have been actively investigating performance with our server and actions are currently being taken. You should expect us to post an announcement with more detailed information soon™.
UlrikHD@programming.devMto
Programming@programming.dev•Where's the Shovelware? Why AI Coding Claims Don't Add UpEnglish
1·7 months agoAppreciate you had the awareness to delete the comment before we got around to the report. It was still a breach of the instance’s Code of Conduct (1.1, 3.2) and repeated breaches may result in a temporary ban.
It’s not helping if some bitch on her menstrual cycle comes and spams her keyboard without any valid points
You’ve already previously been given warning for breaching our Code of Conduct section 3.5 (Hate Speech: Do not make remarks directed at sex, gender…). This is your third strike within 2 months and your account is now at risk of receiving a permanent ban if further breaches are made within 365 days.
Since this is strike 3, your account will be given a 14 days site-wide temporary ban.
- The programming.dev community team
UlrikHD@programming.devMto
Programming@programming.dev•Seeking to make a dynamic website right from the scratch. This is going to be my very first project. How to begin ?
21·11 months agoIf you don’t have anything positive or helpful to say, it would be better to just not reply. If you think the post shouldn’t be posted here, use the report function instead.
UlrikHD@programming.devMto
Programming@programming.dev•The Hippocratic License 3.0: An Ethical License for Open Source.English
51·1 year agoPlease don’t stalk/harass our users, it can and will lead to a site wide ban if reported.
UlrikHD@programming.devOPto
Programming.dev Meta@programming.dev•[Announcement] Official Community Guidelines are now published
21·1 year agoIt is a precautionary policy to avoid what is currently just a theoretical. You’ll be the first to create personal blog community so it will be interesting to see how it works out.
Nothing is set in stone of course and policies may be revised, I won’t make any claim that the current set of guidelines are perfect and immutable.
UlrikHD@programming.devOPto
Programming.dev Meta@programming.dev•[Announcement] Official Community Guidelines are now publishedEnglish
11·1 year agoThe intention of requiring a 3rd party to act as a moderator is to avoid mod abuse from the blog author such as deleting comments or banning people for unreasonable reasons. E.g. someone correcting an error in a blog post and then having their comment deleted and banned by the author in retaliation.
Ideally Lemmy would have more granular level of mod authorisation so that we could just remove access to deleting and banning people.
If someone makes a non-relevant post in the community, it would be removed. If it becomes a recurring problem, we can look into automating that process.
UlrikHD@programming.devOPto
Programming.dev Meta@programming.dev•[Announcement] Official Community Guidelines are now published
11·1 year agoHuh, I wasn’t aware that the alternate frontends offered more utility. Looks pretty nice actually, thanks for the tip.
Programming.dev offers the tesseract frontend here: https://t.programming.dev/
UlrikHD@programming.devOPto
Programming.dev Meta@programming.dev•[Announcement] Official Community Guidelines are now publishedEnglish
11·1 year agoThe mod tools are unfortunately pretty poor on Lemmy. For adding/removing moderators via the GUI the person must first post/comment in that specific community. You can then via the context menu of that post/comment add someone as a mod.
The alternative is to interact with the Lemmy API directly via a script.
I’ve added myself as a moderator, although the whole admin team may operate as moderators, similar to !meta@programming.dev.
If you got additional changes you want to make to the community, e.g. add additional rules like make it explicit that only you can post, or add a banner to the community you should do it now before you’re removed as a moderator. Otherwise you can always DM me/the admin team if you want to make changes to it.
Edit: As Blaze pointed out, you can use alternate frontends like https://t.programming.dev/ to gain additional GUI mod tools
UlrikHD@programming.devto
Programming.dev Meta@programming.dev•Personal blog communities on programming.dev?English
3·1 year agoHi, we have now published official community guidelines as announced in this post.
Please let us now in the linked post if there is still something unanswered.
UlrikHD@programming.devto
Programming.dev Meta@programming.dev•the bot strikes againEnglish
4·1 year agoYeah, we ban the spam accounts on the first report we receive.
UlrikHD@programming.devOPto
Programming.dev Meta@programming.dev•[Announcement] A list of hidden communities on programming.dev is now publicEnglish
2·1 year agoIf you can’t see posts you make on hidden communities that you are subscribed to on your profile, that sounds like a possible bug, and I’d encourage you to report the issue to the Lemmy repo




It’s not about the profanity itself, it’s about what language the trolls/harassers typically use. The comment containing profanity was restored after it was seen to not be harassment. Most new users doesn’t trigger the automod in the supervision period.