doc

Video from Mel Brooks about this, for the headline-only readers among us.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efpL1E_fI3E

It’s a rather short article…

(N)TL;DR: back should mean back. Sites that continue to make back do something else will get lower rankings in search results, which means reduced traffic and revenue.

Is this a second, revised picture? Original didn’t have the transparent book overlay nor him holding a book obscuring Jeff’s face.

Damn right.

Or dogs with bees in their mouth and when they bark, they shoot bees at you?

They curate the subs that appear.

All is everything minus a deny list (nsfw).

Popular is a list of what they approve, or more recently it’s the algorithmic feed.

I only used my own subs for my personal interests or All to discover something new. It was, at least at one time, good for surfacing things I never would have looked for. More often things that didn’t interest me, but that was valuable in itself.

My mom had a reduction paid by insurance. Your case doesn’t mean it can’t happen, just your provider chain is being difficult. Keep trying or change you’re provider if you can.

I’ve never understood why they don’t for roads where there is a parking lane. Or why the connection is perpendicular to the curb rather than parallel.

However, as with most safety things I assume there must be a valid reason they have been installed in this manner for decades.

I hope for more. If they don’t have something substantial very soon they’ve got some serious problems maintaining the standards they profess to have, and we all should question the validity of their content.

I’m waiting for Tuesday. Their editor said they’re looking into the suspect AI written article but due to the long weekend are asking for patience.

Which, honestly, I find unacceptable. To let something that has the possibility of trashing their reputation to fester for 3 days while their audience has idle time to speculate and spread the issue is just irresponsible. Surely such a risk deserves priority treatment. They’re not new at this. I’m doubly disappointed.

This is a worthless story consisting entirely of peoples reactions in social media. What a waste of internet.

Would love to have one without the labels. Perfect wallpaper material. Is the source somewhere in nasa.gov?

It’s always whoever he spoke with last. As such any statements are meaningless.

Is that even one potato?

I think this is less the legitimacy of the tests but the hypocracy of the admin putting such importance in the thing then retalitating against lower level people when one of their own appointees fail.

Insert “not like this” matrix meme here.

https://sopuli.xyz/comment/20676559

D+o+c = … 5?

ISO8603 master race

Year-Month-Day

The FBI said the information came from a “sensitive source with excellent access”

So signal not compromised, but a member of the chats was leveraged to share its contents.

Every instance I’ve seen with actual details has been improper use of real property tax exemptions. In many states you get a discounted tax rate by declaring your home as your primary residence. If you own several properties you only get the discount on one, which is supposed be the one you live at the most (ie primary residence).

The “fraud” part comes in play if you claim multiple properties as your primary. It’s harder to do that if the properties are in the same state, but it’s easy if they’re in different states since states don’t talk with one another. It’s so easy that it’s often accidental.

We’re talking a few grand a year in tax savings. It’s ripping off your state by under paying and people in these positions should know better so it’s harder to give them sympathy, but elevating what may be an accident to a supposed major scandal is a silly headline making exercise.

And why is this happening? Retribution, of course: first person I recall being attacked in the manner recently was MTG.