Well yeah but quantum computers are naturally reversible.

Information doesn’t hold energy themselves, so yes the CPU produces 80W of heat, no matter what computation they do.

(Also it’s pretty hard to define what’s information, people generally talk about information entropy, which is different from thermodynamic entropy. This can be confusing).

But your instinct is correct, one cannot reduce entropy without spending energy. And the kind of computation computers do today does change entropy, so some energy must be dissipated as heat to do computation. This is the Landauer’s principle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landauer’s_principle

Also you need to remember that energy can not be destroyed or created. Expending energy to do something doesn’t mean there will be less energy in the end.

and that’s a no-no.

Not sure why you think that? If information holds no energy then creating it without converting energy isn’t against any physical laws.

Classical computers can never be 100% efficient https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landauer's_principle

A quantum computer, maybe.

Pretty sure my stomach does not think.

Raw cookie dough isn’t save to eat in general though.

Horse horse tiger tiger

One, two, five!

Tinkering is just the life of a Linux user, it’s not limited to NixOS

Try NixOS. If you can make it work for you then you will never go back. Learning curve is pretty steep though.

I mean, first of all this is obviously not 3D printed. This is doomed either way I’d say.

“published” means a very specific thing in academic circles. a paper has to go through peer review to be published.

There are two Microsoft Outlooks inside you.

https://www.returnyoutubedislike.com/

More like there are so many things I need to do yet I am not doing any of them

Edit: so the bluesky post wasn’t accurate. The fake papers were never published, they were pre-prints, and were written to be obviously fake if you paid any attention to read it. LLM didn’t have the ability to tell, some researchers took LLM’s output and didn’t check the source material.

Don’t know what to say. Also kinda ironic this bluesky user apparently didn’t know the difference between a preprint and a published paper either.

Original post:

(I’ve only read the title. If turns out I am terribly mistaken I will come back and correct myself). More like scientists commit academic fraud and fooled a bunch of people. How did this get through the ethics board? Why would any publisher play along with this?

Are drug dogs exempt from ACAB

btw, i just learned recently pyramids weren’t built by slaves.

Sorry to inform you but the drip council has reviewed your submission, and unfortunately the answer is no, you don’t.

deleted by creator

main stream medias are finally catching on i see