

Sure you can only determine if “user is of age or not” with zero knowledge proof. But collect enough proof and statistics can de anonymize that anyway. How is no one addressing that?


Sure you can only determine if “user is of age or not” with zero knowledge proof. But collect enough proof and statistics can de anonymize that anyway. How is no one addressing that?


Lol, thank you. It is my personal homage to how free the fediverse is, and that the responsibility of exposing oneself to the net rests upon themselves or the guardian.


Then why can’t QT provide the same benefit of delivering cross platform developing experience? See, that is the core issue. You write FOR the platform not for yourself. In the web space, the platform writes FOR you lest they want to break compliance with the rest of the web standard. When you are writing web application, you are writing program in a standard that the platform WILL follow instead of you following whatever the platform dictates at the time of their convenience


This is an interesting perspective. I have not thought about this even as a developer.
Cloudflare workers provide a good free tier


Developing cross platform native apps sucks a lot no matter the tech stack. Compared to web technologies where the burden to follow the spec is the platform if they wanted to have interop with the web, the dev doesn’t have to fight the platform.


Correct. The degree that a native app could invade your privacy on the desktop is insane. For mobile, thanks to sandboxing it has a much smaller surface but still annoying nonetheless when an app could just be a web. Especially if all they do is just a glorified form filing app.


Linus called that a good sign, while asserting that he is “much less interested in AI for writing code” and more interested in AI as a tool for maintenance, patch checking, and code review.
Linus knows where the actual problem is in the software development cycle. Not that human code slower but the approval of the code itself is slow.


Now this puts a question for native platform. If web technology managed to get more and more approval to get native access like Web Bluetooth, should we move apps to the web instead? We have web authn as secure hardware backed secret storage. Personally, I like it if everything is not a native app.
The other extreme is if the native platform provides the same interoperability and standard as web. Would you prefer every complex web to be a sandboxed native app instead? Say a youtube streaming desktop app.
It depends on what you want to do. I myself use hostinger to host my NodeJS app. The downside is nodejs are only supported on their business tier web host. To be fair, it is more appealing than VPS with the same price for the infinite bandwidth alone
Whoops, my bad. I didn’t see the need for it to be free


That’s the thing. It doesn’t break it to the point of unusable unlike other patches I think. So the test didn’t catch this since performance is rarely a part of a test suite no?


Wait until all the manga and anime can no longer be accessed by piracy and their sales go down or marketing budget goes skyrocket


I am as muslim but not a scholar. You know what that means so be warned. I think it falls under the same as marriage where the necessity and law is dependent on your situation. It could be mubah, makruh, or haram. I think there is no situation where it could be halal unless somehow your life is threatened without pirating. I cannot equate it to stealing with my limited knowledge because with stealing, there are actual lost not just potential lost. And we already have ruling about speculation / unrealized gain


deleted by creator


Nope. Islam does not have the concept of corporate personhood. It does have the concept of long-after-dead possession (although not strictly owned by said person). When you donate your wealth to the ummah (term for muslim as a whole, usually represented by a government or organization) in the form of wakaf, that wealth may not be re-sold/re-inherited. The wealth is still “attached” to you in a sense and very different from the usual infaq/shadaqa


My recommendation is if you mainly do digital, then get a good logic analyzer and you can cheap out on the scope. The point is you have good digital domain tools, and if the device is reading gibberish, you only need a cheap analog scope to make sure the signal is clean enough. Note that this is if you mainly do digital because if you do analog signalling too, then of course get a good scope instead.


Use aurto to have auto update of AUR package


I think due to the fact that we know for sure the patterns are non repeating, the algorithm would never terminate for an infinitely large plane. But for a bounded plane, then yeah, that’s doable
This is a great find. Thank you very much kind internet stranger