• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This won’t end with wage increases

    This will end in investment in metal detectors and pay downs and shit like that to ensure employees won’t be able to come in with lighters anymore

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Unfortunately both them (and us) forgot that this is the kind of thing their new deal tried to prevent. We didn’t get 8 hour days and 5 day weeks because we asked nicely and they felt generous. We got it because workers back then burnt down shit and the bosses were at a reasonable fear they were gonna get got.

      We need to put the fear back into the rich again if we need to see real change.

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      21 hours ago

      That’s not a new union tactic, that’s an old school union tactic. Organisation and unions started with riots and breaking shit.

      • Signtist@bookwyr.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Really heartwarming to see us go back to our roots. I honestly thought the system had managed to breed it out of us.

  • snoons@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    1 day ago

    Who would win?

    One disgruntled boi with a lighter

    or

    A billion dollar company

    Where’s my stapler?

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I… uh… unfortunately, I’m gonna go with the billion dollar company.

      Insurance will cover most of the damage, the dude will end up in prison, and at most the worst that the company will suffer is higher premiums.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The higher premiums will cost the company almost as much as the arson. Insurance just spreads out financial risk over time; it’s still a net loss for the insured.

      • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I am hoping insurance will do all it can to deny and even then charge more moving forward.

        Alternatively, the company heads will get scared knowing their house is flammable too.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Personally I’d never want to burn down someone’s house. If I found out afterwards they had a pet, I’d have something to feel bad about.

          • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            20 hours ago

            I have seen this repeatedly, and while I understand that it would be sad, what is more valuable: 1-3 pets, or all the humans that will have their lives destroyed by the fuck you set fire to?

            Did you forget why we were here? Liberation isn’t free. Dead animals are very sad. I get it. A dead ecosystem includes many dead animals. Like, MANY.

            • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              19 hours ago

              This is a concept that a lot of people struggle with. They lose sight of the bigger picture and simply react to what’s right in front of them.

              This is why having class consciousness is important. It puts everything into perspective.

    • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      As much as I support the dude’s sentiments, I gotta go with the billion dollar company winning on this one. He’s not getting paid, likely facing prison time, fines, and legal fees, and the billion dollar company files an insurance claim.

      • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        1 day ago

        As a singular instance, sure. But if people become inspired to organize to continue these actions across multiple industries, then we begin to destabilize the system.

        He struck a blow, and showed people it is possible to fight back. That’s a win in my book, regardless of the price he had to pay to achieve it.

      • johnyreeferseed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        I wonder if these kind of things become common enough would insurance companies start charging business higher premiums based on average employees wages because a poor employee is more liable to snap and burn the place down.

      • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        This is how you fight the ruling class without guns though.

        I mean they can put him in prison, but maybe there are hundreds who’ll take his place…

  • fiat_lux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m glad nobody was hurt, he waited until after midnight to set it. But maybe someone needs to call the fire marshals on the Kimberly Clark warehouses. I can hear a fire alarm at the end, and I’m no fire safety engineer, but it doesn’t look like there are signs of sprinklers or other fire suppression systems?

    • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      77
      ·
      1 day ago

      Don’t have the full article but there was fire suppression. Then the fire team showed up, evacuated the building, and, at the behest of the company, shut off the system to prevent further damage to the rest of the products as the fire team was handling the original fire.

      Then the dude went around and started burning other pallets in different parts of the warehouse.

      Waluigi here had a plan and executed it.

      Should have paid them enough to live.

      • fiat_lux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh, that’s very interesting. If that’s true, someone should tell Kimberly-Clark’s insurers that they deliberately shut off fire suppression during a fire. Maybe this will actually cost them a few dollars?

        • oatscoop@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It’s standard practice to shut down a fire suppression system after the fire is extinguished: the water will cause more damage than the fire did if you don’t. The owner is responsible for having someone on “fire watch” until the activated sprinkler heads are replaced and the system is put back into service – which needs to be done by someone qualified to do so.

          It sounds like they did everything “right” in that regard, they just didn’t realize the guy starting fires was still there.

          • fiat_lux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Can a fire really be considered watched if they don’t fully confirm there aren’t other fires? I get that it was a big place to watch and he was deliberately trying to destroy as much as he could, but it blows my mind a little that he succeeded that hard at executing his plan if they were doing things correctly… he annihilated a 1.2 million square feet warehouse with a single Zippo.

            Where I am, if the building alarms go off and the second-tier of our automated systems calls fire services, the fire service (not just the company’s wardens) will walk through the entire complex to confirm there are no fires left. Even if it’s a false alarm, even if it’s the third false alarm that day (which is how we discovered one our very sensitive alarms had an electrical fault one time…). Even if you shut off the water, if there are remaining fires, our smoke / heat / IR detectors will reactivate the alarm systems.

            Either way, even if KC is somehow not at fault, their premiums surely will go up and by much more than they would have spent paying their subcontractors properly. And insurers try to avoid paying, so it will hopefully be costly just for the legal and admin side.

    • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      [someone] was charged by federal authorities with arson of a building used in interstate and foreign commerce

      So because they sell wares in other states, it’s a felony? Not sure I agree with that.

    • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The initial estimate found the paper product inside the warehouse being worth $500 million the building itself being worth $150 million

      Damn. Thoughts and prayers. Though it does suck for the people who lost jobs over this.

      • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        1 day ago

        Nobody lost a job that was paying enough to live there. They should open a co-op in the ashes… Of course it’ll still be profitable enough for the company to rebuild and refill the warehouse.

        • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          It was still a job for those people. If they aren’t being paid enough, sudden unemployment would be pretty scary. I’m not passing judgement on the act, just recognizing the situation that this has put those workers in.

    • snoons@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Oh nice, I thought this was in Ontario. Some difference though.

      *It was in a town called Ontario, in California… D:

        • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          No, it says

          Thick smoke billows from the roof of the Kimberly-Clark paper products facility Tuesday in Ontario … 40 miles east of Los Angeles

          • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            While we were distracted with Iran, Washington and Oregon joined Canada and allowed their army to begin annexing into SoCal. Western Washington/Oregon was cool with it for social reasons; Eastern was cool with it for gas prices.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I am very curious about the circumstances leading up to this

    And I’m very curious how long his court case will take.