Big tech whose business model partially depends on getting children hooked on low quality but rapidly changing content of almost infinite variation (atleast by human life span measure). Lets start for instance by asking which of these platforms allowed prime drink ads. That already eliminates everything except Microsoft probably.
It feels more like he is Netanyahu’s attack dog and some of the tech oligarchs with dad issues treat him like one. The others just lick his ass for free pass to do whatever the fuck they want. Of course you may ask “aren’t these the only modes of friendship that exists in Trump’s life” and you may be right…
Perhaps not as bad as the following from Lord Kelvin
“… but ‘vector’ is a useless survival, or offshoot from quaternions, and has never been of the slightest use to any creature.”
Eh he is funneling money from everything he deems unnecessary (health, science, nature preservation, education, progressing human rights etc) to pockets of his buddies, Netanyahu and tech oligarchs.
It seems that this may be just one step short of a complete dismantling
https://www.hatchmag.com/articles/trump-administration-orders-dismantling-us-forest-service/7716263
I wish they did the same for Nigel Farage
he has been dead silent as of late hasn’t he?
The war is not of his own making, it is Netanyahu getting his favourite dog to commit some of the atrocities for him.
I was just talking about the last farce where B52s took flight so that Trump could pretend “he was just about to do what he promised had Pakistan not interfered”
You would already be doing a great service to the world if you produced a really well tuned search engine / information digger with LLMs but no you had to periodically hype it as AGI because it can memorize entire text books with some accuracy. You did this to yourselves and if you fall it will be because of these expectations which are not met.
Is anyone surprised? He knew from the start US wasn’t going to attack but he nevertheless spent hundreds of thousands of tax dollars so that he could pretend it was real by sending B52 bombers on flight. What a wussy spending all that money to save face rather than improve health care and homelessness.
Later he would be heard giving talks about how LGBTQ is detrimental to psychology of minors.
everyone at that meeting should be barred from any sort of role in the educational sector + atleast a year long mandatory training on identifying & preventing sexual harassment.
I already got downvoted thrice for that comment. So yeah…
Agreed, I don’t think from that statement alone we can say Dino argued for hair not to be there, that I agree. For the same reason, we can’t argue that the woman claimed hair is better than no hair. Therefore logical fallacy here is of another nature and I think the intention here is to confuse the child by committing this fallacy (this I deduce from the tone of the post). I think most people are reacting negatively because they are strongly opposed to leg hair on women and any statement that is mildly less than how they feel is creating strong feelings of opposition.
In which way does my statement fall for naturalistic fallacy? Also in which sentence does the woman in question say leg hair is better than no leg hair because it is natural?
Seems to me that in both cases you are assuming things.
was it an .ml group
I mean I can totally see kids choking on water while doing this too. Yes muscles but I am sure gravity helps too.