• 1 Post
  • 1.18K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2023

help-circle











  • Oh no, I totally enjoyed the rant! There’s nothing better than meeting someone on the Internet who is passionate about a subject, or has significant expertise who can clear up misconceptions or misinformation.

    And yes I agree on the range levelling / squashing, and I think it’s for radio purposes so it sounds good coming out of horrible mall speakers or low-end car stereos / smartphones. Mass market appeal, as you said.

    The surface noise is obviously a problem for vinyl, but in the specific few that a friend had shown me (Nine Inch Nails), I thought it was just part of their aesthetic, because a lot of Reznor’s stuff is “grainy” on purpose.

    On mastering: I’m not even sure what the “new medium” would be for super high end audio, I’ve resorted to FLAC at Quality=11 because .wav/.raw is ridiculously large for no good reason, and internet connections are so fast nowadays (125 MB/s+) that even buying physical Blu-Ray disks is tenous given you can digitally grab the album in under a minute, versus driving to the record store.


  • TLDR: Just get whatever sounds good to you; if you already have working speakers, there’s no need to replace them unless they’re really old / grody.

    I’ve got JBL powered studio monitors and a powered subwoofer with a low-frequency cutoff passthrough.

    The DAC/Amplifier provides the analog signal from an optical input.

    I’m kinda “half” an audiophile, I can definitely tell good speakers apart from bad ones and with room speakers/“monitors” it’s a lot easier to get good sound than with headphones (cone and magnet sizes).

    As for vinyls, I listen to them digitized and they’re around ~192 KHz in dynamic range (compared to 48 KHz for CD), and most speakers seem to be capable of high dynamic range (post 2020 production) for pretty cheap.



  • I think there’s a tangible difference between entertaining and addicting, with a detriment to the consumer.

    If you think about something like slot machines, and gambling addiction, many people are addicted, losing money, and can’t stop:

    Arguably, addiction is bad and should be regulated (see: cigarettes).

    The detriment instead of money (in this particular case) was teens’ mental health, and from what I can recall, the algorithm was explicitly predatory and would serve them up advertisements for things when it detected low or turbulent emotional states, encouraging them to keep using the application and feeling shitty about themselves.

    Meta was given a slap on the wrist, it’s a fine of $300M ($0.3B) on a company sitting on $217.24 billion.

    I doubt they’ll change their behavior but legal outcomes are about setting precedents.