dustcommie [none/use name]

  • 0 Posts
  • 58 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 13th, 2023

help-circle



  • Well, he does have retweets about (black) disabled people. He is well aware of how mistreated they can be(and his audience). I will be honest I do mostly disagree with BRG being irresponsible but I think I will reflect on this and think about it from some different angles. I do have work, so won’t be available but might respond in a day depending on if my thought crystalize


  • dustcommie [none/use name]@hexbear.nettoSlop.@hexbear.netOh no
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I am not entirely sure which point(because I barely made a point lol), guessing it is the “defending disabled people owning slaves” which was more a point on reading what people are saying and putting it into a greater context. If this was not hexbear, and I was not taking into account the greater discussion, I think reading what LeninWeave wrote as defense of disabled people owning slaves would actually make a lot more sense than BRG being abelist. Jumping to BRG being ableist felt very much like ignoring the overall conversation.

    The point I probably should have made but didn’t really is I think it is just rather dismissive and restrcive to essentially say that an event starting from tourretes can’t grow into a larger discussion on what black people deal with, and essentially being policed on how they have to act or else they are being ableist. Yes BRG is being hyperbolic, but it fits into a larger discussion so I think it is unfair to say BRG is just drawing a straight line and equivocating these two. I will forgive BRG for not writing a nuanced dialectic, historical, materialist treaties on the interaction between race and (various) disabilities in racist ableist capitalist society and instead writing a shitposty tweet in relation to larger conversation happening in black spaces(just scrolling through what he has retweeted it seems clear that is what is happening to me).


  • Even if it is, you are giving pretty uncharitable reading… Your post reads more like defending disabled people owning slaves than any abelism from RGB(which I don’t think is your point). Given how much defense of gig industries I have seen on the basis of “helping the disabled” I wouldn’t be surprised if there is some discourse that is unironic in “well they needed slaves”.

    Also I have seen tons of discourse on “disability isn’t an excuse for racism and general assholery they are just racists assholes” (including on hexbear)






  • Not being western doesn’t mean you don’t uphold some western leftism. Are you a guerrilla raising a popular army to bring revolution where you are at and prepared to go to Venezuela and give you blood to fight off Americans and counter revolutionary forces(probably trained by USA) in solidarity as “any true communist would”?

    I am also disappointed, but if the primary problem is American Imperialism which stops and makes communists(or any liberation struggles) sacrifice so much I have a hard time putting lots of blame on them for making compromises and biding their time and preparing(at least I hope that is their perspective, it is hard to prepare forces under debilitating sanction and no real allies helping meaningfully)… The blame is largely the failure of Americans who could actually stop this with relatively little blood shed. Of course if the Venezuelan people rise up and reject this then there would be a different conversation.