Sorry didn’t realize.

Here’s the pew link https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2026/04/07/negative-views-of-israel-netanyahu-continue-to-rise-among-americans-especially-young-people/

I’d be pretty surprised about censoring a pew research survey. We’ll see I guess.

Unlike you I actually have looked at a few of these cases. You can attack that guy all you want, but some of the kids stories are too detailed to dismiss. 2 year olds should not know the details of an obscure murder case.

Anyone who dares to study a non-materialist subject is automatically labeled a quack, and using that to dismiss not only this but everything might conflict with the dogma is exactly what I was talking about.

That’s one theory. If you insist that physical matter is the only thing that exists then it makes a lot of sense. You have to ignore quite a lot to do that, but it is a very tidy concept of metaphysics.

For one thing, there’s thousands of documented verifiable past life memories. You have to dismiss every one of those to be sure there’s nothing more than emergent properties.

https://med.virginia.edu/perceptual-studies/our-research/children-who-report-memories-of-previous-lives/

Why AI

At no point in my lifetime have we had a chance to elect anyone not influenced by capital lobbyists. Our elections are a farce where the choices are between letting things get worse or keeping them the same. We’re ratcheting further and further into hell every few years and given nothing but the illusion of choice to prevent it. The votes and opinions of the working class have literally no statistical influence on legislation passed in this country. None.

Read it again everything I’ve said is consistent. They are all feminists but not all feminists are misandrists. Someone who is anti men is going to be pro women’s rights, not by definition but because they always are.

I have been saying that. Feminists are not misandrists, but Misandrists can be feminists and always are because of course they would choose to be. You can be both, some people are, and media focuses on them to undermine feminism.

“Sexes” not genders this movement predates any discourse on trans rights and related. This movement has always been about women hence the name. Then “organized activity on behalf of women’s rights and interests”. If you think women should be able to vote, own property, have bank accounts, have bodily autonomy, etc. You are for women’s rights and interests, and it is possible to hate men at the same time. In the same way that a black person can hate white people and still fight for racial equality. It’s not ideal but it is possible. You are both redefining the word and gatekeeping entry to the movement.

I’m a man and I do not care if a feminist feels some kinda way about men. They have really good reasons to. Maybe they’ll feel better if and when those reasons go away. Hopefully I can earn their trust by being an ally to them. You don’t get to kick them out of the movement.

Damn women can’t even have their own movement? Its giving “all lives matter.”

Dude. We’re talking about a person who hates men and boys but also thinks women should have fewer rights and opportunities than them. What would that even look like?

Yes? I have never met someone who hates men that also thinks women deserve fewer rights than them.

There also is a fair amount of (very understandable) misandry mixed in with feminism. Not that all feminists are misandrists but all misandrists are feminists and this is amplified in media.

Nope, not viable at all. A lot of it is straight up atomized on reentry especially for the smaller devices. Some of it is rare and some is not. The wet dream of these billionaires is they will be the first to figure out space mining and then manufacture. That’s why Elon musk has spacex and the boring company. Then raw resources like precious metals become infinite over night. Hopefully capitalism dies before that happens so we can all enjoy that.

And the orbits of that debris would still decay within a decade in LEO.

There’s reasonable hope at least that this is a problem that will solve itself, and unfortunately we have bigger problems to worry about.

That’s fair but unfortunately nothing compared to the pollution from launching them

Lmao I wish. Satellites and their components have to be “hardened” to survive extreme temperatures and radiation in space. There’s probably nothing on it you could disable with any laser you could buy. Plus there’s the matter of targeting them.

No way that’s cheaper or easier than waiting