Skip to main content
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2509.18776 (cs)
[Submitted on 23 Sep 2025 (v1), last revised 14 Feb 2026 (this version, v3)]

Title:AECBench: A Hierarchical Benchmark for Knowledge Evaluation of Large Language Models in the AEC Field

Authors:Chen Liang, Zhaoqi Huang, Haofen Wang, Fu Chai, Chunying Yu, Huanhuan Wei, Zhengjie Liu, Yanpeng Li, Hongjun Wang, Ruifeng Luo, Xianzhong Zhao
View a PDF of the paper titled AECBench: A Hierarchical Benchmark for Knowledge Evaluation of Large Language Models in the AEC Field, by Chen Liang and 10 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs), as a novel information technology, are seeing increasing adoption in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) field. They have shown their potential to streamline processes throughout the building lifecycle. However, the robustness and reliability of LLMs in such a specialized and safety-critical domain remain to be evaluated. To address this challenge, this paper establishes AECBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to quantify the strengths and limitations of current LLMs in the AEC domain. The benchmark features a five-level, cognition-oriented evaluation framework (i.e., Knowledge Memorization, Understanding, Reasoning, Calculation, and Application). Based on the framework, 23 representative evaluation tasks were defined. These tasks were derived from authentic AEC practice, with scope ranging from codes retrieval to specialized documents generation. Subsequently, a 4,800-question dataset encompassing diverse formats, including open-ended questions, was crafted primarily by engineers and validated through a two-round expert review. Furthermore, an "LLM-as-a-Judge" approach was introduced to provide a scalable and consistent methodology for evaluating complex, long-form responses leveraging expert-derived rubrics. Through the evaluation of nine LLMs, a clear performance decline across five cognitive levels was revealed. Despite demonstrating proficiency in foundational tasks at the Knowledge Memorization and Understanding levels, the models showed significant performance deficits, particularly in interpreting knowledge from tables in building codes, executing complex reasoning and calculation, and generating domain-specific documents. Consequently, this study lays the groundwork for future research and development aimed at the robust and reliable integration of LLMs into safety-critical engineering practices.
Comments: Accepted by Advanced Engineering Informatics. Code and data available at: this https URL
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2509.18776 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2509.18776v3 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.18776
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 71, Article 104314 (2026)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2026.104314
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Zhengjie Liu [view email]
[v1] Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:09:58 UTC (10,486 KB)
[v2] Tue, 27 Jan 2026 07:17:23 UTC (4,883 KB)
[v3] Sat, 14 Feb 2026 03:14:51 UTC (4,883 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled AECBench: A Hierarchical Benchmark for Knowledge Evaluation of Large Language Models in the AEC Field, by Chen Liang and 10 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
license icon view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2025-09
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
cs.LG

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences