Though you forgot the curly braces and the semicolons are unnecessary.
Yup. These are pretty big issues. But there are also some minor, trivial, purely-preference-based issues - like returning an error if err == nil instead of when it isn’t.
I wouldn’t use the word “robbery”.
I’d use the word “murder”.
Disagree. No computer could ever dream up a reality this stupid.
“I’m not gay, but I need to you take some gay photos for me”
Alternative explanation - the Turkish army is okay with gays as long as they are dominant.
Which… strangely makes sense.
The criteria for what counts as “valid measure method” is not “metrics that would make your ingroup look good”.
When Vance tells a Pope to be careful, that Pope should be careful. You know, considering Vance’s established track record with Popes…
they’re simply requiring any code submitted by AI be tagged as such so that the human using the agent is ultimately responsible for any infringing code, instead of allowing that code go undisclosed
This makes zero sense, because the article says that this new tagging will replace the legally binding “Signed-off-by” tag. Wouldn’t that old tag already put that responsibility on the person submitting the code.
Also - what will holding the submitter responsible even achieve? If an infringement is detected, the Linux maintainers won’t be able to just pass all the blame to the submitter of that code while keeping it in the codebase - they’ll have to remove the infringing code regardless of who’s responsible for putting it in.
There is a world of difference between “not getting the best experience” and “the entire computer is unusable now”.
Okay, but they are not just paying more for the same service. YouTube Premium is worth more now because it allows you to avoid 90 second unstoppable ads. So don’t say Google doesn’t do anything for its consumers customers!
Of course it matters! Each song has it’s own magical effect!
Hard to say what the difference would be
Not that hard, really. Trump is such an outlier that any other candidate from either party would not be able to do as much damage as he does.
Das Fluten Duten indeed.
Is the point that non-voters’ ability to feel morally superior for refusing to vote is more important than the difference between the harm Trump did and the potential harm Harris would have done?
And it’s not like voting for the other candidate could contribute to preventing him from getting elected. That would be crazy.
Zero emissions? Do centaurs never fart?
In your defense, it’s written in the only “modern” programming languages that encourage this category of errors.